AI & Automation Implementation Consultant

I find where AI and automation actually pay off — then I build it.

Fourteen years of software engineering, the last two spent building AI systems that run in production. I look at how your business actually works — the manual steps, the systems that do not talk to each other, the work that quietly eats hours — and identify where AI, automation or better architecture would create real value. Then I design and implement it.

No pitch deck. A working session, then a written opportunity map.

Opportunity review Output
How it works today What actually fits Manual handoff Spreadsheet Shared inbox Legacy system Step 01 Opportunity review Automate it Integrate it Give it an AI agent Redesign the process Leave it alone
14+ yrs
Building production software
7+ yrs
Leading engineering teams
2+ yrs
AI agents, RAG and automation in production
AWS
Certified Solutions Architect

Why bring me in

Most AI projects die somewhere between the idea and the system.

Strategy consultants stop at the recommendation. Developers start after the decision has already been made. I do both halves — which is the only way the recommendation survives contact with your actual systems.

01

I understand the problem

I sit with the people doing the work and map how it really runs — not how the process document says it runs. Bottlenecks, workarounds, and the spreadsheet everyone quietly depends on.

02

I know which technology fits

AI, traditional automation, an API integration, a process change — or nothing at all. Fourteen years of building systems is what lets me tell those apart before you spend money finding out.

03

I can actually build it

Architecture, integrations, agents, retrieval systems, cloud infrastructure, mobile and web. The recommendation and the implementation come from the same person.

The part most consultants skip

AI isn't always the answer. I'll tell you when it isn't.

A lot of what gets sold as an AI project is really an integration problem, a process problem or a data problem wearing a costume. I have built systems long enough to tell the difference — and pointing you at the cheaper, more boring solution is usually worth more to both of us than selling you a model.

AIJudgement is needed on messy, unstructured input — documents, tickets, conversations, images.
AIThe rules are too many, too fuzzy, or change too often to hard-code and maintain.
AIPeople spend their day reading, summarising, classifying, or answering the same questions.
AIThe knowledge exists somewhere, but nobody can find it at the moment they need it.
NOA deterministic rule or a scheduled job would do the same work, cheaper and more predictably.
NOTwo systems simply need an API between them and nobody has built it yet.
NOThe real problem is a process nobody has redesigned in a decade.
NOThe data underneath isn't trustworthy yet. Fix that first, or the model will confidently repeat it.

Approach

From business problem to a working system, in five stages.

Each stage produces something you can act on — so you can stop, change direction, or take the work in-house at any point without having lost anything.

01

Discover

I learn how the business actually operates: the workflow, the tools, who touches what, where things wait, and what people have quietly built workarounds for.

Process mapping System inventory Stakeholder sessions
02

Diagnose

I separate the interesting ideas from the ones that would create measurable value — weighing volume, time cost, error rate, data quality, and how much would genuinely change.

Opportunity map Impact vs effort Data readiness
03

Design

The architecture: what gets automated, what gets a model, what gets integrated, where a human stays in the loop, and how the whole thing fails safely when something goes wrong.

Solution architecture Model & tooling choice Guardrails
04

Implement

Building and shipping it — integrations, agents, retrieval pipelines, workflow automation and the interfaces around them — deployed into your environment, not a demo sandbox.

Build & integrate Deploy Handover & documentation
05

Measure

Instrumenting it so you can see whether it worked: time saved, volume handled, error rate, answer quality. If a piece is not earning its keep, we cut it rather than defend it.

Instrumentation Quality evaluation ROI review

Selected work

Systems that had to work on Monday morning.

Client, employer and product names are withheld — most of this work sits under confidentiality agreements. The engineering is described in full.

All case studies

Background

I didn't start with AI. I started with software engineering.

That order matters. It is the difference between knowing how to call a model API and knowing what happens to your systems, your data and your team when that call becomes part of how the business runs.

2013 → 2016
Hands-on development across .NET, PHP, Java and Android — shipping custom software and mobile applications for local and international clients.
2016 → 2019
Technical lead. Android, IoT and backend work, leading a small team while staying in the code. First serious exposure to hardware-fed, real-time systems.
2019 → 2024
Manager through to Head of Software Development. Cross-functional teams across frontend, backend, mobile and QA; customer-facing platforms, internal CRMs and team portals, and a long run of business process automation.
2024 → today
Head of Software Development, and increasingly focused on AI — agents, retrieval systems, LLM applications and workflow automation — alongside large-scale data platform work built on streaming and analytical databases.
Credentials
MSc and BSc in Software Engineering. AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Associate. Former member of a university corporate advisory committee, and a one-time Android instructor.

The offer

A free AI & automation opportunity review.

You do not need another generic AI strategy document. I look at how your business currently works and come back with practical opportunities where AI, automation, integration or better architecture would reduce manual work and create measurable value — including the ones I would tell you not to bother with.

Two minutes to request. The written map is yours whether or not you hire me, and there is no follow-up sequence.

  • 01UnderstandYour current workflow, tools, systems and where things get stuck.
  • 02IdentifyRepetitive work, manual handoffs, disconnected systems, AI-shaped problems.
  • 03PrioritiseSeparating interesting ideas from the things that would move the business.
  • 04RecommendPractical opportunities ranked by impact, complexity and likely return.
  • 05ImplementIf you want it built, I design and build it. If not, the map is still yours.